Constructive gadfly
Published on February 28, 2004 By stevendedalus In Politics

During these primaries the exchange has been more about the economy than the war. The bleak picture the Democratic candidates paint is echoed by many of the Democratic faithful who feel for those affected by job loss and outsourcing. To the Republican faithful, however, this scenario flies in the face of a stock market rebounding that is attributed to the tax cuts. Most Republicans voters are of the unscathed middle class and higher and don’t care about factory-shut downs or the exodus of jobs that are not a part of their lives and know that the outsourcing means greater value to their stocks. George W is not just a commander-in-chief, he is an easy-going bank teller.


After all, capitalism has to be in favor of crudely cutting labor costs, which in these days of euphemism, is known as increasing the productivity level, and no longer by automation, but rather back to the era of child and slave labor. Who cares that the California supermarket union has been out on strike four months, trying ironically to cling to its middle class status with decent fringe benefits. The usual Republican reaction is that the union is recalcitrant, unrealistic and up against a brick wall that on the other side lurks the Wal-Mart supercenters which boast 20% higher “productivity” level owing to non-union workers, and thus adds to the already comfortable purchasing power to mainstream America. So why worry? Bush is in control, and the unemployed is but a small minority of registered voters.


Why this euphoria among those who think they do not have to worry about job security and depletion of purchasing power? They see, thanks to tax cuts, higher take home pay; they can buy more luxurious automobiles because of the historically low interest rates; why, some of the wealthiest can buy a Lexus on time without interest. Their homes have increased in value and consequently they take out equity loans or new mortgages at lower interest rates so they can indulge in even greater consumption, or perhaps the wiser ones enroll their kids in private schools or stash it away for future college expense. This optimism reflects the DotCom period before the bubble burst.


Nevertheless, much of this good feeling and spiraling consumption is at the expense of huge national deficits and debt, along with a historic trade deficit. The massive home-building under way is owing to many of the middle class selling their modest homes and buying bigger and better domiciles at sky-high prices — not to mention higher real estate taxes — wiping out the equity and capital gains from the original. Low interest rates or not, they are stuck with a 15 or 30 year mortgage beginning from scratch with little equity unless they took the profits and increased the down payment. Very few would do this because a bigger home requires further furnishings.


Moreover, people of the deluded class have a tendency to overlook the hidden expenses of consumption tax, high interest on credit cards, equity loans and new mortgages triggering the tax assessor; nor are they conscious of their take home pay from their secure jobs is actually shrinking because they are required to share in the increasing costs of health care and co-payments. Most of these people are predominantly white collar, but no one has told the computer programmer making $60 an hour that in India the same position is $6 an hour. In this wireless era, the Wall Street broker might have to carry a picket sign in the near future. And, by the way, a war is going on.


 


 


Copyright © 2004 Richard R. Kennedy All rights reserved. Revised: February 28, 2004.


Comments
on Feb 28, 2004
With unemployment at 5.5% and decreasing, the Democrats are going to have at ough time painting things out as being bleak.
on Feb 28, 2004
Tough, indeed. It's not like the days of Hubert Humphrey who used to say that 4% unemployment is unacceptable.
on Feb 28, 2004
According to the Democrats everything is bleak, the markets will crash, the people in Iraq are worse off without Hussein, and they complain that Bin Laden is still at large, but they never lifted a finger to peruse him themselves. Minorities such as blacks and Latinos are sharecroppers under the hateful whips of rich Republican land owners. They complain that the US is alienated from the world, or the international community, which is by definition, France and Germany, two nations that wouldn’t lift a finger to help us if we really needed it , as illustrated in how they ignored sanctions to work with Hussein, paying for his palaces, jails, and torture chambers, while he was firing at UK and US aircraft in the no fly zone.
on Feb 28, 2004
Gloom and doom, Steven lol.. We're simply becoming a nation of consumers than producers. Sure, that scares me witless (not a far fall) due to the fact we'll be oblivious to how to make our own products so when the rest of the world (especially third world) holds us hostage with their power (and potentially go on global strike..boy wouldn't we be fecked) we will have to negotiate just to maintain a government. But until then, c'est la vie..Our economic model is changing. It can't be stopped, dear friends.
on Feb 28, 2004
Following World War II, our country entered an era of enormous upswelling of wealth. For an enormous portion of the American population, it was almost enevitible that each generation would live substantially better than the previous generation.

No one seems to talk about the underlying reasons for this. Earlier in the century, our manufacturing and transportation had developed to the point that promoting increased consumption became the key to further profits for big business -- enter the era of big advertising. Although there were plenty of hard line conservatives who disagreed, the moderates swung our country in the directions of better wages, shorter work weeks, vastly enlarged public assistance, etc. because it was in their best interests to do so. If the general public had more money to spend, and more leisure time to spend it, business would benefit.

Thus, the general welfare of the population and the interests of big business were allied, and both sides benefitted enormously. There have been border skirmishes concerning environmental impact, welfare abuses, union rights, and inflation vs. unemployment, but, on the whole, a large swath of the American population has been a winner... which is why such a large portion of the population considers itself middle class.

The underlying situation appears to be changing, however. Although everyone knows that we now sell many of our goods abroad, and that many of our jobs are also going overseas, I don't see much recognition that this changes the underlying American situation in a fundamental way. Simply, it is no longer clearly in the best interests of the American elite to assure that most Americans have money and time to spend it.

Thirty years ago, if arch conservatives had gotten their way and kicked large numbers of people off welfare and substanitally lowered working wages, business expansion itself would have been threatened. But with every year that passes, this is less true. To the extent that business can expand its global market, it simply does not depend on the domestic market.

Enter what has been called the radicalism of the Bush administration. The people around George Bush simply understand that they are representing the true interests of business. Thus, the situation described by stevendedalus above does not look particularly alarming to these people. After 50 or so years of an aberration, we are slowly heading back to the normal state of affairs where the elites have little concern over what happens to most of the population.

Since most Americans still have it pretty good, and we are only "peeling off" layers from the middle class, most voters are probably not too concerned. Just as no smoker thinks he will be the one to get cancer, most assume that it will be someone else's job that is exported to another country, and for now, life is quite comfortable. Meanwhile, foreign threats are distracting us, and a population getting its voting information from the TV news will be unlikely to think ahead about what is really going on.
on Feb 28, 2004
Don: extraordinary comment. You should copy it and hopefully become a featured article.
on Feb 28, 2004
AR: AR: I shall put my life onthe line for your right to disagree!
on Feb 28, 2004
Luna: Aye, mate, 'tis engraved in cold granite--c'est la vie.
on Feb 28, 2004
Euphoris non acompli

pity the fools BushCo et al who are blind to having already lost the election, so sorry
on Feb 28, 2004
Thanks, stevendedalus
on Feb 29, 2004
I agree with steve, not bad, Don