Chief Justice Roberts — unquestionably he will be — though a conservative and if true to his word that law is dispassionate should not cause a revolution or worse devolution of the Court. He did, however, express a cunning candor that revealed deceptively evasive responses and for that reason will not overwhelmingly be confirmed by the Senate. When a nominee displays brilliance and in a deferential way, there is no cause for the opposing party to filibuster and chance looking like spoil sports. Tradition has been that a president is entitled to his choice, provided the candidate’s judicial philosophy does not egregiously revisit with intent to roll back self evident law of the land.
That Roberts is Catholic is no reason to look upon him skeptically anymore than a justice of any faith: a rational justice is supposed to relegate divine law to individual conscience that in no way should impede deliberations of secular law, or weaken the separation of church and state.
Copyright © 2005 Richard R. Kennedy All rights reserved. Revised: September 18, 2005.
http://stevendedalus.joeuser.com