Constructive gadfly
Published on February 17, 2004 By stevendedalus In Politics


Religious, ceremonious use of drugs has existed in ancient times, perhaps as far back as 3000 B. C. in Mesopotamia [Sumer] and certainly in ancient Greece and Scyth, using opium and cannabis. In medieval Islam the popular consumption was cannabis and a particular sect known fittingly as Assassins used hashish that reportedly heightens homicidal instincts. In the New World prevalent was a pyshotropic mushroom cult in the Mayan culture. Native Americans were engaged with the Peyote Spirit, hallucinogen supposedly strengthening worship.


From this evolves in modern times, the misconceived benefits from drug use by translating euphoria and enhancement of perception as communion with divinity, much as today’s athletes on steroids convince themselves they are stronger warriors. Drug use among adults is not as serious as among youth who tend to overdose and become dysfunctional by turning within themselves or their rather closed small culture; whereas many adults are capable of controlling severe addiction and continue to contribute to society and their own edification, although not as effectively as those free of usage.


Despite organized crime or cartels, all crime is local; the cartel needs only to find a single individual in the community to handle supply, and drug dealing is set in motion. Heavy use of narcotics began in the slums where frustration reigned and therefore used as a cop-out. Fear of, or indifference to, policing these neighborhoods breeds anarchy. Currently, however, use has become widespread, crossing all areas of society, probably owing to affluence, which to some becomes boredom. Youth addiction is at first thought to be no more hazardous than smoking and drinking — those strong enough to hold it to moderation may escape the brutalizing ends. It is important to differentiate between the user and abuser, the latter is primarily on self-destruct, the former is more or less moderate, causing little more than a diminishing purse, and little cost to the state, if at all.




Notwithstanding the euphoria, abusive addiction over time blinds common sense to the effects on respiration, the spinal cord, heaviness of the limbs, sweating and flushing of skin, let alone the effects on the brain and heart. The irony is that the increasing disorientation of use drives the addict to one function: obtaining more drugs to numb the seriousness of their condition. Heavy users, however, should not be arrested, but rather rescued from the vice and placed in attractive rehabilitation centers.





Up to 9/11 it was ironic that the super power of the world was wimpish in defense of its homeland. A significant cause for the spending- cut fever was the justifiable frustration over a losing war on drugs — Gen. McCaffery to the contrary — that is directly and primarily related to escalating costs of crime. To spend three times as much on crime per capita as on education is not the mark of a healthful nation. This frustrating dilemma on the one horn is the desire to free the country of this plague; on the other is the absence of national will. The call to arms against drugs is a ploy to assuage almost 90% of the country that isn't on drugs.





The remaining 10% takes its snort, then nods in agreement with a silly grin on its collective face as it quickly wipes away the tell-tale dust from above its lip. Small wonder in ‘88, few responded to the Dukakis outrage over Noriega—to many this drug-runner was a national hero, a godsend to their addiction. Despite the relatively small population on drugs, the seriousness is that among the young and unemployed the percentages are higher, and regardless the total are in the millions. This said, the costs of a war on drugs could be drastically reduced if the emphasis is on the drug lords and their henchmen in lieu of huge expenditures in targeting the visible users.


Comments
on Feb 17, 2004
Nice blog. I think you go too easy on them though. The war on drugs has not found an enemy for he is the very people who claim to fight it who are th biggest drug dealers in the world. Any review of the true purpose of the Skull&Bones fraternity shows clearly it is about smuggling and drugs; pure and simple folks, smuggling and drugs.

Mena Arkansas had 'BOXCARS' of cocaine travel through it in the 1980's and there is much testimony of meetings with Bush and the Bin Laden family for over 20 years. They financed Noriega, then took him out; the Cali cartel, the Medellin cartel, Vietnam. By some more-than-strange coincidence, Bush family members are at the nexus of drug legislation its interdiction and distribution for over 100 years. Peope just don't want to admit the obvious facts before them and stick their head in the sand rather than face it.

Okay, now we got an issue. Let's see what the sheeple say now.
on Feb 17, 2004
So why should drugs be illegal and fought anyway?

- cause they´re bad and dangerous for society!

Well so is the conglomerate of christian fundamentalists that makes up a fair share of the US population....
who elect a Pres. lie G.W, who is the CIC of the american armed forces who have a WMD.arsenal
......but u see no one fighting a war on bible-selling and church building.

Hippocrite is an american word.

George Washington was the biggest tobacco grower in the US, he produced Beer, whiskey and Cider as well.
..... and coke consumption in the white house dates back to the invention of coke.

Can´t beat the feeling.


- Weltregierung


on Feb 17, 2004
It just occurred to me that the War on Drugs has a lot of parallels with the Abstinence Only movement.

* Withold information and color it as "education".
* Paint a black and white moral argument - you are either good or bad, legal or illegal, moral or immoral
* Enact laws which prohibit related activities to the detriment of those who need help (needles and AIDS, condoms and pregnancy)

I said it before and I'll say it again - history repeats itself.

If knowledge is power then ignorance is.... ?
on Feb 17, 2004
...sour bliss? There is no question,Poet, that vice is here to stay, yet efforts should be made to keep it under some control. Though I don't think abstinence is a solution--that's Victorian and we're in Victoria's Secret era--nonetheless, tempering the emotions and frenzy for kicks makes for better citizens, not evangelists.
on Feb 17, 2004
Ansthema, yes, I feel the biggest problem is in the lack of will to beat this thing, especially with all the drug money lining pockets of politicians and the police.

Weltr, there is definitely hypocrisy here--like the drunken father beating his kid for smoking pot. Still...