Constructive gadfly
Blogger meanders
Published on February 14, 2004 By stevendedalus In Blogging


Midnight Basketball

After-school programs is not pork and should not be treated lightly. Every minute on the basketball court is a drug-dealers moment of
frustration. Anyone who is against prevention is one who did not listen to Batman. Even the jail movies of the Thirties featured the defender of rehabilitation and usually it was the warden. Every minute after school for individual counseling is a minute away from the emptness of working couples, or fatherless homes. Every minute of rehearsal or music lesson is a minute free from shoot-outs on the streets.

The real pork is to contractors who build the prisons. Far better to ship the most violent criminals to a desolate Pacific atoll. Drug addicts belong in boot camp and non-violent, drug-free, first time felon should be placed in a controlled environment and given public works jobs cleaning up the environment. Chronic drug runners and dealers over the age of twenty-four should be mailed to Colombia.

Less Government

For a hundred years in the spirit of a United States the northern industrial states shared generously its revenue to the southern belt. Now that the south has thrown away its kerosene lamp, thanks to the graces of the Democratic Party and the Tennessee Valley, it no longer wishes to play by the rules as a new industrial power because the Dixiecrats are now full blown Republicans who ride herd on Jeffersonians but love the theory of states rights.

State government and so-called local governments are the worst leviers of taxes since the Romans. The Republican scheme has always been to focus on the central government while the people are being robbed back home by their own kind who abuse the much heralded Tenth Amendment and resistance to the National Labor Act.

Pork: the rich man’s white meat

Congress cannot trust itself and control its appetite for pork. Nevertheless, perceived toxic is another’s bread and butter, but special tax loopholes for individuals and corporations should certainly be eliminated. Pork and perks—a way of life—are not restricted to the federal government. Local politics, universities, small businesses, corporations—and, yes, charities—all indulge. And for the states rights fanatics, the whole pig stays home.


Welfare Reform


The only true welfare reform possible is through a war on poverty with the creation of jobs and job-training. The safety-net now used is stagnated precisely because the Republicans thwarted the Democrats’ move to wipe out poverty with equal opportunity workfare. As for impoverished unwed teenage mothers, it is the family’s responsibility to pursue community assistance to feed another mouth. If the teenager is kicked out of the house, rather than building more orphanages as we do prisons, put more money into local out-reach programs for temporary housing until the family is forced to take its daughter back or face a federal penalty. As for the rare, proven worthless schemers where children are not involved, give them three weeks notice to get a life or lose benefits. They have three options: job, armed service, or exile.


Education

Whatever happened to tracking in schools? It seems it has been derailed? Every child is entitled to public education, hopefully in order to become a reasonably intelligent citizen. If correctly grounded in the minimum essentials of instructive learning, and with good counseling, a student in his second year of secondary education should know whether he or she wishes to continue in academics or shift to a vocational school. Billions are wasted on frivolous college curricula and on hundreds of thousands of students who are poorly advised or totally misplaced. However, elitism is not advocated here because life time continuing education should be an option for every citizen.

Drugs

How long can the narcotic incursion go on? A horrendous problem that seems to be forgotten other than its dire effects on the crime scene. The war on drugs must be revitalized — on a plane with terror — not only to reduce crime, but to curb AIDS and the demoralizing effect on youth or there will be no future for millions of today’s youth, resulting in a bleak future for the United States.

Comments
on Feb 15, 2004
When will we realize the "war on drugs" is not working and change our approach? I am suprised and dissapointed in you stevendedalus.

Time to write a blog on this I guess.
on Feb 15, 2004
We had a war on poverty in the 60s. Trillions have been spent. Yet the poverty rate hasn't changed.
on Feb 15, 2004
Looking forward to that blog, Poet!!
on Feb 15, 2004
Sorry, you all are disappointed, but either we face up to the deleterious effect of drugs on youth culture or throw up our hands and legalize them. At least, crime would be reduced and child drug running would be replaced with selling papers or shining shoes.

If "war" is the point of objection, I apologize, but that does not discount the need to extend a hand to genuine helplessness.
on Feb 15, 2004

Steve, definitely the whole war on drugs is a complex issue.  I would definitely be interested in hearing your thoughts in detail (i.e. in a blog article) on what you believe is happening now and what you think should be done.

Personally, I have no idea. I am generally against legalizing drugs because it would, I think, make them more available. I realize people say you can get drugs all over the place now but I tend to disagree. I, for instance, have no idea where I would go to get illegal drugs. I'm sure I'm not the only one.

Let me use an analogy - buying a condom at the store was difficult enough when I was..ahem..younger. But approaching the school burn outs to buy same condom would have been unthinkable. I tend to think of drugs much the same way - even if I wanted to start trying crack, there was no way I was going to go ask the stoners at school where I could get them.  On the other hand, if I could go up to the local Walmart and pick up Crack(tm) it makes things infintiely more accessible.

on Feb 15, 2004
Brad, This I promise to do. For now, I proposed a crackdown because I, too, am not an advocate of legalizing narcotics other than for medicinal purposes or as pain-killers for terminal cases. Condoms in schools are not necessary since Walmart and others display them boldly. I empathize with that younger feeling of hesitancy and, yes, shame, in approaching the drug counter and mumbling for a Trojan. Also, I, too, wouldn't know a drug dealer from a boy scout, but I'm sure were I to ask my kids they, unfortunately, would know.
on Feb 15, 2004
on Feb 16, 2004
Steven, it may be just me, but you seem to have 6 blogs in one. Even pairing them would leave you with 3 different ones... how are we to comment on such a wide array of topics? it seems that each person who replied only did so to one topic anyway...

good stuff, well written, but what about breaking it up?

Just a thought...
on Feb 16, 2004
Well, the war on drugs, hm? Well, war is hell..but I don't see any hell being raised over drug use. As a youngin myself, or was not too long ago, drug use of many varities are very accessible..From pot to crack coccaine..Maybe it's my environs, but I don't feel I'm alone in my statement.
However, I've seen first hand from family members what a drug addiction will inevitably lead to..There is no Maybe about it. Death, regardless of what incarnate it takes from Overdoses to AIDS, claims those who escape into the fantasy land that is their drug addiction..much younger than nessecary.

How do you have a war on drugs when the people providing the money to support the war, often enough are enemies OF the same war?
How do you reform big business when Big Business supports your Government?
None of these things can happen as long as things remain the same as they are now. I have no other solution than that.
Nobody wants to give up their quality of life to make sure little Jimmy stays off the crackrock. Sure, they want to help them..but not so far as to worsen their own conditions to do so. We want a safer more environmental friendly Big Business machine..But who wants to give up their disposable diapers or their plastic soda containers that neglect to be properly recycled?
Nobody wishes to make sacrifices to make sure the things that need to get done actually get done.
But what's that? You pay taxes to take care of this situation? Tell me, when was the last time throwing money at a bad situation ever fixed anything for any of you, in the long run?
Now, I'm just as guilt..I don't want to give up crapola, but then again..I'm not to terribly worried about Jimmy, either. As long as he doesn't try to break into my house to steal my things..I'd have to shoot little Jimmy, but atleast then his addiction would be overwith.

As for the rest of your post, Steven..Not bad, atleast you have some suggestions, even if not nessecarily 100% sane. (And they're not totally ridiculous as some suggestions, either)
on Feb 17, 2004
Imajinit, not just a thought but a good thought. It's merely an outline for further reports.

Luna, gotta start somewhere.
on Feb 17, 2004
I agree with many of your comments. As mentioned above it is a multi point article and harder to reply to, but I believe that much of your responses are linked together in forming a choherent society.

On midnight basketball, I totally agree. I do believe there needs to be the use of the word supervised here. If you don't then the drug dealers will just move to the baskerball courts. Society is showing that many parents are unable to provide a stimulating and encouraging environment for their kids to grow up. Schools and the state need to expand yo help parents here and provide extra circullar activities.

less government. No major comments as I don't know the US system well enough. I personally believe in splitting your taxes 3 ways (not necessarily equal) and giving it to national (Federal), semi-national (state) and local (city/council). You should have some personal say in what fractions you want to pay to each of these.

welfare reform: strongly agree with the responsibility of the parents/carers here. Don't like the idea of a safety net. It implies that you don't need to do anything and can lie safely on it. Welfare is good, but needs to be linked to effort. The more effort people put into improving thier situation the greater the support should be and the more encouragement they should get. Work for welfare should be the accepted norm, though many forms of 'work' should be acceptable. For example, a single mother wanting to raise her kids should perhaps be given the support to join a creche, where they can raise their own kid and help mind other kids.

Education: Agreed here. The recent report on the state of US education, with diploma's being described as 'attendance certificates' highlights how bad the system is. Some form of national standard is required.

Drugs: As mentioned elsewhere, how do you fight this war. You can go for the suppliers or the consumers or both. I believe both are required.

Paul.

on Feb 18, 2004
Aye, supervision is essential in after school projects. Inner city schools are shortchanged because the tax per student does not come near matching the wealth of suburban schools, thus, cities need more bucks.
Welfare has always been a misnomer--it's not a give-away if adminstered properly; besides, I'm from the era of public works, that is, workfare.

National standards are now pretty much consistent now; there was a time when the poorer states were far behind. The crucial point, however, is that we must face up to the obvious: not all are college material and need alternative curricula.
on Feb 20, 2004
My diploma's more than an attendance certificate, isn't it? *sniffles and starts to cry*