Constructive gadfly
Published on February 7, 2004 By stevendedalus In Politics



Let us first deal with the perception that Americans don’t feel secure in time of crisis with Democrats. Since Reagan this has been forced fed to the public by the right wing. Odd that it didn’t bother the nation during eight years of Clinton. Surely, the rest of the world felt more secure with Clinton even though he sent troops to Haiti, Bosnia and Kosovo, bombed Iraq innumerable times, devastated bin Laden’s camps. The reason is that, except for preemption in Haiti, clearly to end the influx of illegal immigration, he seemed cooperative in foreign affairs: initiating peace negotiations spanning two Israeli Prime-ministers in the Israel-Palestine quagmire, confronting North Korea with an imperfect peaceful alternative, and Asia-Pacific Cooperation Economic forum. Somalia, of course, was unsuccessful in following out the UN directive to “rehabilitate the state.” Incidentally where is it mentioned that eighteen marines died under Bush Sr.’s watch? Albright’s “assertive multilateralism” got off to a poor start but proved the right direction to take with the successes at Kosovo and Bosnia. Presidents don’t as a rule win honors in foreign policy, anyway — vis a vis George Sr. and Panama — but Republicans successfully brainwash the public. Prior to 9/11 Bush W’s foreign policy was lackluster and disruptive now he equates himself with Churchill..


Now, of course, there isn’t much the Democrats can do to influence foreign policy; however, with the campaign in swing, they must espouse a future State Department direction beginning with pushing for a high profile UN ambassador of Adlai Stevenson stature to speak eloquently in behalf of the environment, fulfilling nutrition and health care needs for third world countries, especially many in Africa, culminated with a plea for basic universal health care for the entire world, beginning with our own nation. It is not a matter of weakness for the American delegation to pressure peaceful solutions with respect to rogue states — labeling them axis of new dreams and aspirations. The focus on Iran, for instance, should be through insisting on the separation of church and state, especially with its two tier system already in place. With North Korea, it is time for the military to withdraw and let civilian officials turn the country around, and when that happens US troops finally will come home. There should be an emphasis on building a coalition for the purpose of protecting and eventually removing nuclear matter and waste. Asia should be cajoled into forming their own sense of united identity, much like Europe and should be led by India, Japan and China. Far from being Lincolnesque, China nevertheless has a point in keeping Taiwan under its wing. The best hope is that Taiwan be declared a province with independence and democratic identity but still loyal to the mother country that vows not to expand communism to the province. There is a need, too, for a United Africa and the US should be its champion. There is in fact, too much tribalism in the world and every sect of a different dialect or belief feels it should be a confederate — this should be frowned upon or else the world will never achieve world peace.
Until technology overcomes it lag with the dream of star wars and a man on Mars expensive testing should be suspended. More imperative are practicable strategies for homeland defense against terror, such as beefing up air patrol of borders and a strong infantry defense. Large appropriations to the Navy and Coastguard are needed for the protection of our shores and ports in the war against terrorism. The latest surveillance technology should be stressed for off-shore patrol boats. Navy PT division should be in the main for domestic use.
A universal moratorium on immigration should be enacted, except in cases where immediate members are still abroad, and in cases where qualified scientists and the technically skilled are needed for defense purposes. In the future immigration should be geared to the nation’s employment needs. Political refugees should be sent to other democratic nations in need of new blood. Mexico must get its act together in preventing immigrant incursions by policing its own side of the border and in building an infrastructure to forge a higher standard of living for its people with assistance from us via a strict oversight of a mini-Marshall Plan. Haiti has proven its total incompetence and should petition to the US for a ten year MacArthur like administrator as was done in Japan. The embargo on Cuba should be lifted unequivocally provided it concurs with a totalitarianism phase out calendar.
   
Copyright © 2004 Richard R. Kennedy All rights reserved. Revised: February 7, 2004.

Comments
on Feb 07, 2004
Very informative posting. It raises several ideas and issues I don't think of in my day-to-day. Takes some tough positions usually reserved to a Candidate in his final months, and reflects a lot of thought.
As to China I will say 'under its wing may be a bit soft on the reality. 'Under its heel' might be more apropos. China is infected with the capiatlist disease, and Taiwan is a logical location for its fostering in a transitional dictatorship, true. I watched as the new leadership of Taiwan was literally sold to the richest of puppets and have no doubt their goals are inconsistent with China's ancient policies of isolationism. China plays with capitalism, it is so big. I read of them commissioning the consruction of 5 cities modeled on capitalist ideals. To them it's like building play towns, complete with skyscrapers and bus lines, just to study what it is and how to control it. Scary powerful people those isolationists, who remain largely un-affected by the NWO policies of the rest of the world.
on Feb 07, 2004
They're also tricky because there are several provinces they leave alone--watch and see how their capitalism works.
on Feb 07, 2004
I don't disagree with what is posted, but in terms of creating peace it is highly limited, though I also can't expect you to go into all the various aspects without creating an entire thesis or website. (see http://www.pathwaystopeace.org/ ). However, it does also presume a top down type of peacemaking which is inherently flawed. the generation of real peace is a matter or bottom up formation, via the grassroots efforts of individuals, and these efforts come in the form of transcending personal greed and attitudes of wanting for the self and of only watching out for number one. The collective transformation that needs to occur is for people as individuals to regognize, create, and adopt attitudes beyond the personal, beyond the national, and toward a practicing global perspective where there is no us and them, but only we. not to dismiss any of the original post, but it is only one small piece, but in order for it to develop in needs political pressure from below, from the crucial process of individuals choosing to live their lives differently than they are now, until we reach a critical mass. And we better get on it, time is not on our side.
on Feb 07, 2004
Wahkonta Anathema Could you please email me I have some info I'd like to pass along, Thanks
lobstertoes@yahoo.com
on Feb 07, 2004
Jeff, I couldn't agree with you more--meaningful action always comes from grassroots or inspired leaders. The enormous obstacle today is the continual disception across the land blurring significant priorities. WMD is foremost...uh, on the other hand, it doesn't mean anything...Saddam is the imminent danger...uh, if not, then democratizing Iraq will make us safe...Tax cuts, too, will build patriotism...uh, Sharon is in the same boat as we, that is, regime change...the state department is no longer the top administrative department because of its history of appeasement...yeah, a general is in charge, but he's no longer tough like in the Gulf War...he's a wimp now...Rumsfeld is the man now...he grew up loving John Wayne movies and was made aware by new reports how heroic his high school buddies were in Nam...Cheney, after all, was a CEO and intuited that what Iraq needed was Halliburton New Deal projects...and he learned that from MacArthur's experience in Japan...beside, we have to put some excitement into the American populous that requires a kick ass mentality every decade...etc. Kucinich is a product of grassroots and where does he stand? We need someone to wake us up.