Constructive gadfly

Flying in the face of a bipartisan panel of legislatures from many states expressing harsh criticism of NCLB, Jeb Bush displays unabashed nepotism by following his brother’s Texas initiative. In lieu of facing up to the challenge of “failing” schools by lobbying for the tried and true formula of Title I, the program that was designed to assist schools in dire need, the governor, tail between his legs, scampers off with the solution of private school vouchers that have in no stretch of the imagination proven to be the wherewithal.

Know since the 60s that the problem is substantive strategies are lacking — let’s face it — in schools of disproportionate minorities plagued by disadvantages of poverty, home support and language. The majority of students are products of suburban and some city schools that for years have benefited from more generous funding so that it incrementally at least has made strides in solving inadequacies of curriculum, instruction and supportive personnel for individualized learning.

NCLB came onto the scene as just another ruse of “crisis” as though all 15,000 districts in the nation had been lethargic in their dedication of meeting the needs of children — how insulting, the forest for the trees! Failing students, not failing schools were always the problem every teacher agonized over. The profession had been uplifted in the Johnson years of Title I being fully funded until the roadblock of the Vietnam War. For thirty-five years Congress has never lived up to this commitment to the disadvantaged child who continues to suffer through this shameful neglect.

Jeb Bush emphasizes this perennial neglect by the deception that “vouchers” unrealistically doled out to 10,000 of the 170,000 “eligible” will somehow change the momentum of failure. The remaining 160,000 are glibly left to the “failing schools,” let alone that the 10,000 disadvantaged will place the parents in further financial straits in trying to make up the difference. Even worse, are vouchers to those barely failing whose parents are financially better off to make up the out-of- pocket costs.

When there is a teacher shortage, school districts have always offered incentives during recruitment but not by upsetting union contracts but by fudging the pay scale in acknowledging the “experience” scale in business or the armed services and simply by incentives for continuing education and in-service credits for certification. Bush’s suggestion to award the better principals $5,000 bonuses can only lead to subjective inequality and resentment. Being principal is its own reward and need not be treated as a phony CEO, rather than the best educator in the building already reflected in his or her salary. If he or she is not, the contract is not renewed.

As for the middle school becoming more like a high school, J Bush misses the mark: if anything middle school should be more like grade school up to and including seventh grade and more like junior high for grades 8 and 9 wherein there is the gradual introduction to specialization in Math, Science, foreign language and the Arts to prepare them for high school academics — not as it is now in the middle school delusion of preemptive socialization as high school neophytes.

The worst governor proposal is the rollback of mandatory class size. True, there is no question that the mandate is unyielding and should be modified, but not as an unwholesome motive to save money. Changing the class reduction of K-3 should be further reduced to twelve and fifteen for 4-7 in which the pupils would receive greater individualized instruction, along with a curricula designed to give more attention to the three Rs, along with story telling and play acting, perhaps even after school. The higher grades 8-12, averaging 30 in a class, would be more manageable as the lower grades come of age to step in far more prepared and motivated to handle material that matters most, rather than the governor’s plan to handle what matters most to his brother’s scam.

Copyright © 2005 Richard R. Kennedy All rights reserved. Revised: February 25, 2005.

http://stevendedalus.joeuser.com


Comments
on Feb 25, 2005
Strange, when I was in Elementary school (in the late 60's early 70's) we had around 30 in our classes, and we somehow learned reading, writing, math, history.. etc. The "resource" kids were seperated for a few hours for some specialized instruction, but when they were caught up, they joined back in the full day with everyone else.

If smaller classes are the answer, Milwaukee Public Schools must be the best school district in the country. Since they can't seem to convince 75% of their kids to show up consistently, the classes must be great!!

I'll admit that NCLB is not the answer. No federal program is, because what is best for education in Milwaukee has nothing to do with what's best for education in Atlanta (or anywhere else). Federal programs take too much of a "one size fits all" approach to everything.

To me that problem isn't just the kids, the parents, the teachers, or even the administrations. All three are dropping the ball at one point or another. The problem is, each are too willing to point their fingers at the others.

Education is a team effort, and the federal government is not part of the team!

I think vouchers, Charter Schools and other non public school options would help in some areas, but maybe not in all. What I am against is telling kids in school systems that are failing miserably, that they have to stay and waste their time, simply to protect the jobs of their teachers.
on Feb 28, 2005
What I am against is telling kids in school systems that are failing miserably, that they have to stay and waste their time, simply to protect the jobs of their teachers.
Kind of harsh. TV, internet, electronic games are also a big problem and why it is essential that the younger grades get more educational attention.
on Feb 28, 2005
TV, Internet and Electronic games can get in the way of education, but if you are trying to say that they are the problem, you are only making excuses.

The schools that are failing aren't doing because of any of those, they are failing because teachers aren't teaching, kids aren't attending, and parents aren't parenting, and the only thing administrators think is lacking is "money".

As long as each of these groups are pointing fingers at each other, schools will continue to fail.

In Milwaukee, schools are a sad, terrible joke. They are nothing but cesspools for gangs and drug activity. What grand and well-thought out strategy does the administration come up with to combat 75% truancy and 61% graduation rate? "Um.. We need more money."

TOTAL AND COMPLETE BS!!! They already get more money than any other county in the state (the rest of the state has a great reputation nationally).

What they need is Competence in their administration and staffing. Since they have proven beyond any doubt that they aren't up to the task... BRING ON THE VOUCHER, CHARTER AND PRIVATE SCHOOLS!!!

Harsh? Harsh is the life pathetically inept schools are inflicting upon their communities.
on Mar 02, 2005
BRING ON THE VOUCHER, CHARTER AND PRIVATE SCHOOLS!!!
Yeah, like they will be able to rectify all the ills you point out which are much greater than the education within its own framework. I say harsh because you seem to think that money in itself is not the problem--neither do I--but to ward off these prevailing problems in society we have to start with more agressive attention to the children to make a better world. 
on Mar 02, 2005
but to ward off these prevailing problems in society we have to start with more agressive attention to the children to make a better world.


I'll agree with you here. More attentive parenting would reduce most of our societal problems (where our kids our involved).

The pressure, however, will always be on the teachers and administrators. Not because you are the only ones who can do anything about it, but neither parents nor students are on the taxpayer payroll.

I share your frustration with innattentive parenting!!!
on Mar 02, 2005
but to ward off these prevailing problems in society we have to start with more agressive attention to the children to make a better world.


But when discipline is removed as an option, even for loving parents to administer, it does make it kind of hard, doesn't it?

So much attention has been focused on "the rights of the child" that the parents, if following said guidelines to the letter, would effectively be neutered, and we would have future generations of children raised with no moral compass.

Give parents back some rights, give educators back some discipline rights without fear of lawsuits, and you may see more change than increased funding could EVER hope to bring about.
on Mar 03, 2005
Give parents back some rights, give educators back some discipline rights without fear of lawsuits, and you may see more change than increased funding could EVER hope to bring about.
Good point; except we've been screaming for this since the 60s.
on Mar 03, 2005

The pressure, however, will always be on the teachers and administrators. Not because you are the only ones who can do anything about it, but neither parents nor students are on the taxpayer payroll.

Maybe we should put both on a accountability payroll--student and parent.

on Mar 03, 2005
Good point; except we've been screaming for this since the 60s.


Yes, but just because you've been screaming for this since the 60's doesn't make it any less relevant to those of us who have been screaming for it since the '80's.
on Mar 08, 2005
doesn't make it any less relevant to those of us who have been screaming for it since the '80's.
My intention is not to create a generation gap. I'm glad you're screaming for progress.