Constructive gadfly
Published on October 30, 2004 By stevendedalus In Politics

Reported on JU that Christopher Hitchens supports Kerry was an excusable falsehood owing to inbred snarling of Christopher himself in The Nation weekly. He still “slightly prefers Bush.” He mentioned his support of Kerry only sadistically so he could gleefully continue — second only to Limbaugh — his snide, vindictive remarks upon the liberal wing. He claims he can’t wait for a Kerry president reaction in the discovery “al-Zarqawi is more dangerous and better-organized foe than bin Laden...” as if Kerry with the grim reality of insurgency and beheadings did not already know this, though surely not equal to the global extent of bin Laden.

Hitchens slightly prefers Bush because he is impressed by the president’s “conversion from isolationism” implying Kerry’s “lapse into isolationism” is skeptical. Outrageously — but for his iconoclastic history — Hitchens decries the left’s “anybody but Bush” as nihilism and suggests the left would even prefer al Sadr without the slightest exploration as to what the cry really means. The mantra was blared out of the primaries that even Lieberman or a Graham would be a preference to Bush, if they were winnable. Hitchens has the audacity to accuse the left, without qualification, of sneers and smirks — this coming from one who invented them — over the deployment of troops in Afghanistan, as also holds true in Iraq, ignoring the obvious that both ventures were poorly executed and undermanned. Given the elections there apparently, the “astonishing success” he sees in Afghanistan, nonetheless, requires a much needed reality check into warlord domination and drug trafficking.

He dares the left to challenge “the battle against terrorism and the battle against dictatorship are the same thing.” With this tautological mantra, the left-wing apostate smugly avoids the implications of a foreign policy bogged down in routing all dictatorships while trying to ferret out pockets of terrorism — let alone evading the reality that a dictatorship, however it admittedly terrorizes its own people, seldom, unless territory is in dispute, take terrorism abroad.

I wish The Nation would stop kowtowing to this pompous miscreant.

Copyright © 2004 Richard R. Kennedy All rights reserved. Revised: October 30, 2004.

http://stevendedalus.joeuser.com

 


Comments
on Oct 30, 2004
But Steven, even if he is a pompous miscreant, he has a viewpoint that you are unlikely to find on the pages of The Nation without him there.
If all you want is a left leaning publication, I am sure you can get the guardian on-line or even the NYT.
I truly think he is pretty dang pompous but you see that a lot in over educated former liberals who have gone to the other side of politics.
That and he often makes good points, (if you can get through the verbosity).

on Oct 30, 2004
You have a point; however, he blasted and quitThe Nation a half year ago for lack of [his] insight; after he worked for them and reaped recognition for twenty years!
on Oct 31, 2004
This is funny.

First, blogic uses Hitchens' endorsement of Kerry against Bush. Now, stevendedalus uses Hitchens' retraction of that endorsement against Bush.

I have a suggestion that could save them both a lot of time:

Publish a single article stating that Anything and Everything that happens is a reason to dump Bush.

Then they could go play cribbage or something and have all their bases covered.

Cheers,
Daiwa

Cheers,
Daiwa
on Oct 31, 2004
Publish a single article stating that Anything and Everything that happens is a reason to dump Bush.
been there, done that.
Hitchens' retraction of that endorsement against Bush.
not unexpected from a guy like Hitchens--he'll hitch his dwarfed star to anything to sell copy.LOL
on Oct 31, 2004
he'll hitch his dwarfed star to anything to sell copy


Kinda like.... Kerry, to get votes?

Cheers,
Daiwa
on Nov 01, 2004
Kinda like.... Kerry, to get votes?
In accordance with your slant, yes.