Though the deciding vote is which commander in chief is more likely to end the war in Iraq and secure an acceptable enduring peace, there are other issues that are connected.
Winning Iraq is of little consequence:
if we expose our own borders and ports of entry;
if we ignore the Palestinian-Israeli crisis;
if we fail to establish common sense relationship with Iran by joining Britain, Germany and France’s current negotiations, while simultaneously gleaning rapport among its majority which wants reforms;
if we don’t call North Korea’s bluff by returning to inspections and the “light water” nuclear reactor offer;
if we don’t swallow resentment and assist Spain to fight terrorism where cells are still deeply entrenched;
if there is no White House Dutch uncle-jawboning for the intelligence agencies to terminate their respective territorial professional jealousy and forge a true camaraderie to search out aggressively terrorist cells at home and overseas;
if there is no solid industrial base that can easily switch to war plants in time of crises;
if we don’t check the monopolies of Wal-Mart and its ilk, before it gets into defense contracts “we can supply the defense department with much cheaper arms and war gear from China,” let alone undermining small business, many of which are the backbone of the nation’s defense supplies;
if we don’t end the madness of tax cuts, corporate welfare and tax shelters, rendering defense vulnerable by institutionalizing war-borrowing from foreign countries, while generations are born into bankruptcy — on the other hand, this could be a mixed blessing in that there is no way future citizens could afford to indulge in wars of choice.
Copyright © 2004 Richard R. Kennedy All rights reserved. Revised: October 21, 2004.
http://stevendedalus.joeuser.com