Constructive gadfly
Obama Losing Luster
Published on August 16, 2008 By stevendedalus In Politics

 

 

With the freshness of Obama wearing down like a new car smell, it’s back to politics as usual, given the clarity that the grumpy old man surprisingly is keeping the race close. Normally a failing administration in an election year would cause the opposing candidate to be at least double digits in the lead.

Despite the crystal grazing even when backed by polls and analyses that favor Obama, there is no certainty he will be the clear winner. Albeit the youth vote in the primaries was overwhelmingly and enthusiastically, the general campaign is losing its luster by pressing Obama to sound more like an ordinary politician. Of course, the convention’s drama—granting a stage for Obama’s oratory—will again effect a swelling youthful vigor, but if his debates do not display articulate and sharply knowledgeable issues and problem-solving the short attention span of youth will as usual wane in interest.

Many experts predict the black turnout will make Obama competitive even in the south, yet no one really has a handle on to what extent this will intensify white backlash and its turnout. This applies to Hillary’s swing states as well such as Pennsylvania, W. Virginia and Ohio, not to mention the backlash of the Cuban vote in south Florida.

Race aside, moreover, no one really knows—since unfortunately religion and subcultures are hugely influential—how strong the forces still hung up on God, gays and guns are willing to put them behind for the good of the nation’s foreign relations, economy, infrastructure, and energy independence.

I just hope Bill Clinton will be proven wrong that the democrats are in all intents and purposes sailing along on the cloud of a fairy tale.

Copyright © 2008 Richard R. Kennedy All rights reserved. Revised: Aug 16,  2008.

http://stevendedalus.joeuser.com

http://www.lulu.com/rrkfinn

 


Comments
on Aug 16, 2008
Well all well and good, there should have been some change 10 years ago but the Democratic were in they world of being like kid's who did not want to do the homework like jobs, housing problems,etc, some then have this idea's of beating down the poor people's and not putting the money back in the right place's. The plantation view that the democratic have, might made it to the white house if everyone fall to sleep and God I hope that some of us keep our eye's open. With the kind of black American experience that I have, I will say this, that it a shame that Obama is not a Black Republican, the democrat should be happy that some one put life back into then, beside playing the age's old card, with a white woman.
on Aug 16, 2008
The last 2 times the democrats won, they ran a moderate southerner. It has been almost 50 years since a non-southern democrat won, and he did so by running as a strong defense moderate.

And still they do not learn.
on Aug 16, 2008
I hope that some of us keep our eye's open.


Me, too.
And still they do not learn.

Yeah, except the Dems have to be center right to appease the south.
on Aug 16, 2008
Yeah, except the Dems have to be center right to appease the south.


I would not call Clinton or Carter Center right. Both were center left. And as both proved, you do not have to capture the entire south, just a couple pieces of it.
on Aug 18, 2008
Well, a center that's always shifting with the times and pandering.
on Aug 18, 2008
and pandering.


That is the first definition of a politician.
on Aug 18, 2008

Part of the problem that the Dems face in this election is that when they took control of congress in 2006 they made a lot of lofty promises and have failed to deliver on almost every single one of them, the biggest of which is Iraq.  In 2006 most Dems ran on a platform of getting us out of Iraq, yet here we are 2 years later still there.  This is causing a backlash against Dems which is part of the reason that the race is so tight.  Sure voters are sick and tired of Bush and the Republicans but the Dems haven't done much in the past 2 years either.

I know it's not likely but I keep holding out hope that maybe people will catch on that the virtual two party system that we have is horribly broken.  Maybe, just maybe, we can get some more third party and/or independent candidates into congress so that we can actually change the way things are done in Washington.  And if nothing else hopefully people will realize that we need to kick out everyone running for re-election to serve as a reminder of who those jokers are supposed to work for.

on Aug 19, 2008

In 2006 most Dems ran on a platform of getting us out of Iraq, yet here we are 2 years later still there.

Blame the bluedogs; they're not real Democrats. Besides, the Senate is hanging by a thread and turncoat Lieberman.

on Aug 20, 2008

Blame the bluedogs; they're not real Democrats.

2 years ago, we heard about the Rinos.  Now it is the bluedogs.  Those in power sure like to carp on their members.  Yet I did not hear any of that when Pelosi and Reid were stumping for the supposed "blue dogs". (and yes, the same can be said when Bush was stumping for the Rinos).

Any wonder why I am very adamant in my claim that I am a conservative and not a republican?

A conservative is a conservative, regardless of the letter behind his or her name. (substitute liberal for those on the other side of the fence.)

on Aug 25, 2008

That's why I like to think of myself as a new--or old--new dealer. It certainly would change the blue and red electoral map if we truly labeled ourselves.

on Aug 25, 2008

It certainly would change the blue and red electoral map if we truly labeled ourselves.

And like finding bigfoot, it will never happen.