Constructive gadfly
Published on October 17, 2004 By stevendedalus In Misc

How is it the pundit volume goes up significantly when hard working full time toilet cleaners who nevertheless need government assistance in variable forms, while criticism of profitable large and corporate farms receiving subsidies is on mute? Could it be that most farmers, with the exception of their hired hands, are long standing white male citizens as opposed to the presumption that toilet cleaners of America are black or Hispanic of whom a good share are women? I suppose, decibels of criticism depends on the political power of said groups. Besides, without the enormous efficiency and surplus of today’s farms, there would be no food stamps for our hardworking toilet cleaners.

Vioxx

The argument for high costs, American pharmaceuticals rely on strongly, is that research and tests take years to insure effectiveness and safety. Why would anyone want to chance foreign druggists? The definitive answer could very well come from 1.3 million users of Vioxx .

Safety & The Commander in Chief

Why in the world would anyone want to question who should be the commander in chief? Surely, Kerry would have waffled over the deportation of Cat Stevens.

Taxation without Representation

Seventy percent of Americans wanted the banning of assault weapons permanent. Congress ignored them while the president sat on his ranch fence.

[Have I raised any brows?]

Copyright © 2004 Richard R. Kennedy All rights reserved. Revised: October 17, 2004.

http://stevendedalus.joeuser.com


Comments
on Oct 19, 2004

[Have I raised any brows?] Apparently not.

on Oct 20, 2004
*raises brow*
on Oct 20, 2004
Bingo, Texaii!
on Oct 20, 2004
You always raise brows!
on Oct 22, 2004
How sweet you are, Very Wise, to raise your brows!