Did you know that scoring system gives five points to an “Ugh” reply? — the same for an insightful reply. Moreover why is a well-written article only 15 points, equal to nothing more than a fanciful blurb? I also notice that the top users rack up points furiously with their incessant spillover at the forum.
Being new to the game — and not aware of the forum for sometime — I hesitate to suggest a different, better scoring system, inasmuch as most of my blogs go by un commented, so it will sound like sour grapes. And I agree an article that is unread is pointless. Nonetheless, they do get cross referenced by the search engines and I suspect that points are given for those, even though most of them are simply keywords and searchers find they are not what they wanted.
Alas, I suppose quantity prevails and is simpler; surely we do not want an editorial board sticking its nose in where it is not wanted.