Constructive gadfly
Frenzy of “gotta have”
Published on September 29, 2004 By stevendedalus In Politics

After the formal surrender of Japan’s naval base in Yokosuka, I became eligible for discharge in ‘46, meaning that I had to surrender my trusty Browning Automatic Rifle that got me out of some hot spots in the past. There were no gun laws then; it was simply a matter of turning in government property. I was permitted to keep a Japanese bolt-action rifle I had picked up during the mop-up days at Okinawa but had to turn in its ammo clip. This souvenir was stolen aboard ship going home, but I explained it away: being a city kid who really had no interest in gun-collecting anyway. Besides I still had a Rising Sun flag and a Japanese officer’s binoculars stuffed in my seabag.

In my day everybody knew that high-powered rifles and hand machine guns were readily available to the underworld, supplied by unscrupulous gun makers. Yet if we could believe the old G-Men movies, these were limited to the Mafia, kooks, and genuine gun collectors; hunters were content with their buckshot, the Winchester hung over from the Wild West, and the vintage bolt-action‘03s. It was not until the DOD demanded greater fire power by modifying the size of the magazine that holds significantly more cartridges, did the imagination of gun owners take hold — why settle for an eight round clip when a lousy marksman can be armed with a rifle of sixteen or more to spray the sky for a duck?

Though shooting down continuance of the assault weapon ban was disappointing, realistically banning these are cosmetic and symbolic of a nation’s frenzy of “gotta have” — despite and because of terrorism. As long as there are uncontrolled global gun manufacturers bent on arming the world, no gun law will be effective — the hell with domestic tranquility.

Still, as an old BAR-man who carried a magazine belt containing two hundred deadly cartridges, I think it’s a bit much that one has the right to demand even more for his hunting trip, even if limited to a Garand enhanced rapid fire semi-automatic. On the other hand, these goodies are there for the taking and what consumer does not want more of the latest gadgets? Guns are like cell phones — “can you hear me now, squirrel?”

        

Copyright © 2004 Richard R. Kennedy All rights reserved. Revised: September 29, 2004.

http://stevendedalus.joeuser.com


Comments
on Sep 30, 2004
Guns are like cell phones — “can you hear me now, squirrel?”

This is so good.

I knew a woman in a town I used to live in that had a 15 year old son that wanted something called an oozy automatic that was for sale at pawn shop. He couldn't get it, so she bought it for him. I thought I was right about being appalled, terrified and outraged. And I still think I was right.
on Sep 30, 2004

Reply #1 By: WiseFawn - 9/30/2004 10:31:45 AM
Guns are like cell phones — “can you hear me now, squirrel?”

This is so good.

I knew a woman in a town I used to live in that had a 15 year old son that wanted something called an oozy automatic that was for sale at pawn shop. He couldn't get it, so she bought it for him. I thought I was right about being appalled, terrified and outraged. And I still think I was right.


You are correct in being appaled! What she did is both WRONG and ILLEGAL! It's just plain wrong and it's called a straw purchase which by federal law is illegal
on Sep 30, 2004
By the way, it's an "UZI", not an "oozy". ("Oozy" is the correct pronunciation, though.) I'm amazed that she was able to purchase it herself, unless it had been converted to semi-automatic only.
on Sep 30, 2004
very good post, especially from someone who knows all kinds of guns
on Sep 30, 2004
Reply #4 By: Myrrander - 9/30/2004 11:57:27 AM
very good post, especially from someone who knows all kinds of gu


Hey *myrrander* it just so happens that *citahellion* is 100% *correct*. And before you say *anything*, I'm a licensed gunsmith and do know my firearms!
on Sep 30, 2004
Thank you, Very Wise. And I am thrilled that your comment hit the spot.