Constructive gadfly
A New Revolution Inevitable
Published on September 16, 2004 By stevendedalus In Politics

Reagan began a revolution in this country wherein the mythology of conservatism and rugged individualism took over the land driven by the manifesto that big government was the enemy and the only cure was big business unregulated. The Reagan honeymoon cannot continue for much longer; indeed, to some degree it suffered a setback during the Clinton years. Although it was resurrected in 2000 and seemingly its illusory system has reached a crescendo today, there are ominous signs that the manifesto is frayed.

For fifty years the merger of government and business created a growing middle class and set out reasonably well to rectify the injustice wreaked on the disadvantaged. The liberal credo of both major parties was not to promise the moon, but modestly to level the playing ground for the common good and to monitor excessive demands by both management and labor to sustain a balance in the wealth of the nation. Today wealth is perceived as individuated ownership of a nation, much like shareholders; on the contrary, it is the collective energy of a people to forge pride in a commonwealth of justice and tranquility. “Shareholders” tend to focus on management as the god of profit-making and forget the labor end that makes it all happen. They are also myopic in believing that in virtue of inalienable ownership their well-being is based solely on their own brilliance, ignoring not only the labor behind their good fortune, but also the concerted teams behind to feed them, to protect and beautify property, insure against fraud and safety of trust funds, to systemize the education of their children, and to defend the nation from marauders to strip away its resources. In this light, entrepreneurism and rugged individualism diminish in importance, since “no man is an island unto himself.”

Fortunately in this great nation founded on law, reason, and compassion for the “general welfare” of its people, in lieu of the current “Wild West” mentality prevailing today, the people will awake from the 19th Century and unite to build that promised “bridge to the future.” Divisiveness — pharmacists against contraceptives, disloyalty to American families by outsourcing, permitting illegal immigrants to rollback middle class lifestyles, blasé perception of our armed services as mercenaries to further militarism, Dickensian “thousand lights” that never turn on to help the poor, a woman’s personal choice inevitably presumed pro-abortion, lionizing Reagan and W. Bush for accumulating trillions more in national debt than all the other presidents combined and shamelessly the ostensibly wealthiest nation on earth is the biggest debtor, immense tax writeoffs and shelters for the affluent — will ineluctably result in a new revolution, relegating Reaganism back to the century of robber barons.

This current scenario of selfish, god fearing, dictators unto themselves that engender nothing but a severely divided country will regain — not necessarily in this election but soon — through sanity and tranquility the business of “promoting the general welfare” , the prima facie of this nation’s heritage.

Copyright © 2004 Richard R. Kennedy All rights reserved. Revised: September 16, 2004.

http://stevendedalus.joeuser.com


Comments
on Sep 16, 2004
Excellent article. Thanks for posting it.
on Sep 16, 2004

Reagan began a revolution in this country wherein the mythology of conservatism and rugged individualism took over the land driven by the manifesto that big government was the enemy and the only cure was big business unregulated


you correctly characterize it as a revolution.  "revolution of conservatism"--while a much more informative descriptor than 'reagan revolution'--is a strange juxtaposition, but one that provides a telling insight since the two concepts are generally in opposition to one another.   of course, reagan's policies and initiatives were--more often than not--hardly the stuff of conventional conservativism despite they way theyve been spun and respun. reagan's administrations in sacramento and washington dc, as youve so sagely pointed out, made the concept of  'compassionate conservative' the bitter joke it is today. 


from the 19th Century


omg.  steven? that superscript thing leads me to suspect your document may be a fraud or forgery.

on Sep 16, 2004
Well said, well done.
on Sep 16, 2004

that superscript thing leads me to suspect your document may be a fraud or forgery.
Love it! Reagan and conservative is not in opposition but rather complement each other. Of course, he was not as extreme as Bush W.

And thanks to all.

on Sep 16, 2004
I would argue that a true economic conservative is against tax loopholes.

You can blame Bush and Reagan for deficits, but our biggest non-defense expenditures are from programs created by Roosevelt and Johnson. Has the working class gotten stronger through increasing social security taxes?
on Sep 17, 2004

I would argue that a true economic conservative is against tax loopholes.
It would be a very weak, simplistic argument.


And we should be all for corporate welfare with defense contracts and forget the contract for the disadvantaged, eh?

on Sep 17, 2004
the contract for the disadvantaged


Who is this contract with?

A flat tax, for instance, eliminates tax loopholes.
on Sep 18, 2004
Call it by Dragonal's favorite term "mommyism." I'd go for a modified flat tax that is progressive.