Constructive gadfly
Published on August 18, 2004 By stevendedalus In Politics

When will the Republican Party cross over to the millennium on economic issues? The Party is extremely defensive by connoting labor rights with entitlements. This is in the face of no apology whatever in the hierarchy of the corporate world bestowing outrageous and unearned executive salaries, gauche perks and top of the line health plans. The word “unearned” is seldom used in the hierarchy — other than the internal revenue nomenclature — because of the symbiotic rise to power deemed as a well-earned Herculean entrepreneurism. On the other hand, the common worker who puts in an honest day’s work should be grateful for whatever the company decides is a living wage predicated on the weakened demand in the labor marketplace, owing to the demise of the unions.

Even worse today is the strategy of outsourcing which bludgeons the definition of an honest day’s work. By eliminating millions of manufacturing jobs, capitalists flood the job market which devalues the demand for service workers — but for the highly skilled were never paid much anyway — thereby putting to rout, or at least diminishing, the value of labor, salvaged only by consumption of cheapened imports. What the Republican Party never takes into account is that the cheapening of labor is a precarious tool to amass the fortunes of a few at the expense of devaluating the worth of the lower class. Were it for the credit card the effects of this tool would be dramatic if the common worker had to thrive in a “cash only” economy. These few, however, cleverly invest in the credit card industry at enormous profit in order to keep consumption humming with the uncanny ability to absorb increasing bankruptcies and in tandem to ignore the obscene duress of millions of families.

 Actually this modern capitalism is designed to hoodwink the masses into thinking they never had it so good. If a breadwinner — an anachronism, since today’s economy demands the plural — can purchase daily bread for his/her family on credit so he can pay the rent, he/she believes he is surviving well, but never once in his/her consciousness is the welfare of his/her children’s future beyond presenting them a cell phone for graduating high school. Also in the consciousness of the Party is the belief that lower class Americans should stop whining because in other nation’s their perception of poverty is relative wealth. Further, the Party endorses the myth that all it takes is ambition to pull oneself out of the lower class, while the leaders are oblivious to all the “entitlements” from birth-right to lucky genes that imbedded them in a higher class.

Is this class warfare? Not so, the lower class has no power to wage war — alas, not even the Democratic Party. It remains with the Republican Party to step in and lose its vestige of insensitivity driven by plutocratic mares.

 Copyright © 2004 Richard R. Kennedy All rights reserved. Revised: August 18, 2004.


Comments
on Aug 18, 2004
Which country is better than the US for workers?

The US has gained not lost manufacturing jobs this year.

You certainly do need more than ambition to succeed in life. You also need hard work, education, and discipline.
on Aug 18, 2004
Umm...workers in the United States (especially salaried white-collar drones) work more hours than anyone else in the world.
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/work_howmuch_dayone.html

http://www.japanupdate.com/en/?id=4942

http://www.hazards.org/workedtodeath/

It is hard to find American statistics on death by overwork (hazards might only have UK info) because of a lack of awareness. (I doubt BLS is going to want to compile those kinds of figures.
on Aug 18, 2004
Brilliant and insightful article!
on Aug 18, 2004
Outsourcing is a problem, a problem created by liberals who have established a mountain of taxes and regulations aimed at corporations.

This economy thrives on competition, but we must also compete with the world which is able to produce many goods at a lower cost than can be done in the US because of the years of penalties enacted against the wealthy business owners, employers and corporations in this country. The inevitable result is people buying goods from the other sources.

There are only two solutions to this issue: go out of business or find a way to lower your prices. How can you lower prices? by cutting health care benefits, lowering wages, outsourcing, etc.

The same laws that are supposedly put in place to protect the working class are the very laws that are forcing companies to either move out of the country, cut benefits,lower wages, or go out of business altogether causing even more job losses. Instead of the blame falling on the government where it belongs, it falls upon the "evil rich guys trying to squeeze another buck out of the poor helpless lower to middle classes.

It is no myth that anyone with ambition can succeed in this country, it is not always easy but there is a myriad of programs out there that will allow anyone no matter how poor to get a college education. These programs are hosted by not only the government and local charities but most employers offer to pay for schooling.

Government is not the solution it is the problem
on Aug 19, 2004
First of all, stevendedalus - I know English probably isn't your first language, but it would be great if you used simpler words if you want to get your point across clearly. Some of the phrases you use are illogical, contradictory or just a grammatical nightmare; there are some great monosyllabic words out there that would fit better. If you wrote articles in the same way that you make replies there'd be no problem, but it almost seems like you write with a poor-quality English-something dictionary at hand with some of your articles.

On the topic of your actual argument, I tend to agree to some extent with what I think you're saying. Credit is largely backed by either large companies or shady businessmen with reputations for kneecapping and execution, so don't tend to face many defaults. The large companies on the other hand don't seem to think too clearly about credit risk, and so use classical psychological and propaganda techniques to persuad the weak-minded into bankrupting themselves. When I was in school playing off the weakness of others was a sin; for big business today, it seems it has become a virtue. However the reduction of costs through the cheapening of labour is a natural byproduct of capitalism. The very father of capitalism, Adam Smith, was the first to warn of the dangers of his ideology (don't believe me? read The Wealth of Nations and then call me a liar) and was followed by both socialist thinkers (eg Marx) and economic writers like Keynes.

Where I disagree with you is in your analysis that the rich can do something about the situation. I feel that they are as locked into the profit-driven model as much as anyone else. It is only through group action worldwide that international capitalism might be tempered with the proper concern for humanitarian outcomes. One day there shall come the 21st or 22nd century equivalent of the 19th century trade union, and the power balance between employer and employee will turn a little more towards the employee.
EDIT: God, I sound like a pinko commie socialist here. Still, collective action or masses of charisma has always been the best way to deal with a recalcitrant boss, so I don't think this is going to change too much.
on Aug 19, 2004

The US has gained not lost manufacturing jobs this year.

But it hasn't put a dent in the overall loss these four years. Besides, I question your stats here.

Where I disagree with you is in your analysis that the rich can do something about the situation.
Merely-tongue-in-cheek, inasmuch as the Democratic Party lacks balls.

Cheez, sorry about that! I thought I was writing in English.

LOL