The brouhaha over No Child Left Behind is hallucinatory, particularly with respect to accountability and testing lacking sound philosophic principles of education by a posterior “devoutly to be wished”-syndrome. To begin with , it is presumptuous to surveil a time honored system that has developed, however imperfectly, the underpinning of extraordinary knowledge for the nation. Since its inception public education has always collegially monitored its own academic accountability through endless staff meetings, supervisory class auditing, intensive mastery of instructional methods for child-subject-oriented advancement that balances the academic with the child’s learning capability. Nor is this balance lost in teachers’ unions, which in negotiating personal advancement seldom if ever goes to the negotiating table without reflecting community demands, together with their own, to enhance credentials, curricula and individual instruction.
That said — and as in the 60s’ Title I in behalf of the disadvantaged — the problems are social and more or less the same rather than infrastructure of education per se, owing to the changes in the character and environs of the pupil generated by increasing minorities and disadvantaged. Since the 60s the solutions to this social change has been in place but funds for improvements have been left behind — now funding is still the problem with NCLB. What is worse, is that there is a horrendous conflict among vouchers and charter schools that divert attention from the primary goal to enrich the knowledge of young people in the public schools that are housed by superior credentialed teachers.
“Failing schools” do not exist in middle class suburbs — most assuredly not in wealthy districts — that in the main are segregated defacto. Also strides are made at the outskirts of metropolitan areas, in which there is reasonable integration, provided the minority remains a minority where assimilation and acculturation of the spectrum can grow naturally. The quagmire is in the segregated inner city and other schools of the disadvantaged. With ever growing poverty and diminishing middle class, segregation is here to stay, and learning there must be given undivided attention: head start for boys three years old, and four year olds for girls; kindergarten for five year old girls, and six year old boys: This will help boys, who mature more slowly, a chance to catch up and be more capable to compete in the first grade and beyond. The building blocks of curriculum must be in clear-cut sequence so that the pupil can confidently and logically develop a consistent reference. After school programs should be essentially for reviewing the day’s work and homework with adult assistance and relevant lessons by computers.
Segregated secondary education in these disadvantaged districts, must further segregate by tailoring the curriculum to sundry levels of ability — not everyone is college material — with emphasis on vocational, commercial, and technological training, along with advanced placement for promising kids who defy the curse of stereotypes.
With these measures testing will fall naturally into place as they do now in schools that have escaped the mark of shame. Only by serious, and targeted expenditures on education will “failing schools” be an aberration of an unrealistic past and present.
Copyright © 2004 Richard R. Kennedy All rights reserved. Revised: June 3, 2004.