Constructive gadfly

Talk about GM merging with Renault and Nissan is just another subversive move to lose US identity. Already GM is in the process of again downsizing its assets in this country rather than reaffirming itself. When I was a kid GM was but a shadow for trucks and not very big ones, which were left to White Horse and Mack. Its true identity was in its fleet of automobiles and its bread and butter, much like the economy Ford, was in its Chevy for the average blue collar family. The Pontiac, and the economy models of Olds, and Buick, for the incrementally growing middle class. Higher brackets went for the bigger Olds and Buicks and ultimately the crown jewels — La Salle and Cadillac.

GM needs simplicity by fading into the background and letting the great names of the past be rediscovered but with new, quality stressed engineering. The GM medallion should only be on trucks and heavy chassis SUVs and available at Saturn dealers.[Preferably Saturn should be discontinued.] Passenger dealers should be discouraged to feature GM. Chevy dealers on the inventory lots should feature compact-chassis utilities, suburbans and stripped down Malibus, along with low mileage Cobalts [renamed simply Chevy, and Corvettes and Monte Carlos in showrooms to be on order.

Pontiac should consist only of Firebirds and a new relatively luxurious mid-sized called the Chieftain available in a convertible and two and four door sedan.

The Olds, should return and showed in Cadillac showrooms as OldsRoadster, inspired by the famous Cord and original Corvette, to answer the T-bird and Miata.

Buick should consist only of a newly designed Roadmaster convertible and sedan as a direct answer to the Acura.

One Cadillac should be offered that would be the envy of Lexus and Lincoln.

Needless to say, each division would be distinct and no auto parts interchangeable with any of the others. Bring back America.

 

  

Copyright © 2006 Richard R. Kennedy All rights reserved. Revised: July, 19, 2006.

http://stevendedalus.joeuser.com


Comments
on Jul 19, 2006
Talk about GM merging with Renault and Nissan is just another subversive move to lose US identity.

Meh like GM and Vauxhall
on Jul 19, 2006
Ah, you want for your youth! Sorry, that will not come again.

GM wont merge. Because it is GM. Not because it should or should not.
on Jul 20, 2006
G M like to many others are in the pockets of big oil for pension money, that is precisely why they discontinued the electric cars, which would have pulled them out of the soup and likely set them on a path to recovery.
on Jul 20, 2006
GM is getting what it has made for itself.

Made and sold inferior cars.
Did not see the future and cranked out gas guzzling behemoths instead of inovating.
Merger or not this donkey is dead unless they reinvent themselves quick.
on Jul 20, 2006
At the core of the merger talks, required by Kirk Kerkorian, is the feeling that GM's management is simply incompetent. Kerkorian has $1.7 billion invested in the company. Rick Wagoner, GM CEO, has had his pay cut in half.

GM lost $1 billion buying and then selling interest in Fiat. (Note to the boys at GM: It is buy LOW and sell High, not the other way around.) GM's new ecology-friendly technology, the cornerstone of its current ad campaign, is licensed from Toyota. Why? Because they lack the ability to develop it themselves.

Many of the foreign companies that are eroding domestic car sales were financed by the Big Three. GM signed a capital agreement with Isuzu as far back as 1971. (While publicly decrying sales of foreign cars.) GM owns Korean car maker Daewoo, for example. GM is now reaping what it sowed.

Fire the management team and hire real car people.
on Jul 20, 2006

Fire the management team and hire real car people.

I got to comment on this!

Yes!  But it will take a lot longer before I buy one of their vehicles!

And I guess that makes me the problem.

on Jul 27, 2006

Yes! But it will take a lot longer before I buy one of their vehicles!

Even if they brought back the Olds and La Salle?