Cheney and Early Retirement

on Apr 25, 2006

holdinng a band of neocons who plotted a war behind the backs of the American people,imposed graet suffering on the Iraqi people and even now is creating trouble in Iran.

This time, I trust, the congress will be more enlightened and analytical, let alone the people.

Thanks, Doc, but i don't wish to "scare" conservatives.

17

Daiwa

on Apr 25, 2006

Reveling is good.

18

drmiler

on Apr 26, 2006

Impeachment is a political process and it is what Congress says that counts. The Constitution says High Crimes and Misdemeanors (that is what Congress defines) are causes for removal of the President or Vice President.

Congress approved the war predicated on the information Bush gave them. If all the intelligence and military assessment of the danger Saddam posed to this country in 2002 would have been available, there would not have been a war resolution passed by Congress.

You know something? You're a "broken" record! The dems have "tried" (yes tried and FAILED) to bring impeachment proceedings against Bush numerous times now. And they were shot down each and every time.

19

drmiler

on Apr 26, 2006

Don't get too smug, yet, steve.
With a thanks from Charles and a cookie from drmiler, can I now revel?

"If" you wish!

20

COL Gene

on Apr 26, 2006

Chrales.c

The members of Congress DID NOT have all the information Bush had. A FEW members may have had most of the information but because it was classified and could not discuss even when they were considering the War Resolution.

The information as to IF Saddam and Iraq was a REAL danger consisted of BOTH Intel about WMD as well as the military assessment of the capabilities of Iraq in late 2002. The most recent revelations from the former European CIA Chief like the same information from Mr. Piller prove that Bush ignored ANY Intelligence that did not support what he had decided to do - Invade Iraq. Both these CIA Agents were like long members of the CIA and BOTH were head of sections within the CIA where they saw ALL THE INTELLIGENCE.

Then you have the information from the retired generals like Zinni and Trainor. Even if you do not agree wit their call for Rumsfeld to resign, the information they have provided about the military assessment of the danger posed by Iraq as well as the WMD issue show that much of the available information was ignored by Bush because he had decided to remover Saddam and the intelligence about WMD nor the Military capability of Iraq to be a threat was not important to Bush. We went to war against a country that had NO MILITARY CAPABILITY, which was proven be the swift defeat of their military. We also went to war against a country that had no WMD as Bush and Cheney said absolutely they had in spades!

21

drmiler

on Apr 26, 2006

Chrales.c

The members of Congress DID NOT have all the information Bush had. A FEW members may have had most of the information but because it was classified and could not discuss even when they were considering the War Resolution.

The information as to IF Saddam and Iraq was a REAL danger consisted of BOTH Intel about WMD as well as the military assessment of the capabilities of Iraq in late 2002. The most recent revelations from the former European CIA Chief like the same information from Mr. Piller prove that Bush ignored ANY Intelligence that did not support what he had decided to do - Invade Iraq. Both these CIA Agents were like long members of the CIA and BOTH were head of sections within the CIA where they saw ALL THE INTELLIGENCE.

Then you have the information from the retired generals like Zinni and Trainor. Even if you do not agree wit their call for Rumsfeld to resign, the information they have provided about the military assessment of the danger posed by Iraq as well as the WMD issue show that much of the available information was ignored by Bush because he had decided to remover Saddam and the intelligence about WMD nor the Military capability of Iraq to be a threat was not important to Bush. We went to war against a country that had NO MILITARY CAPABILITY, which was proven be the swift defeat of their military. We also went to war against a country that had no WMD as Bush and Cheney said absolutely they had in spades!

Ba-ba-baaaa! All talk and no substance.

22

DJBandit

on Apr 26, 2006

The members of Congress DID NOT have all the information Bush had. A FEW members may have had most of the information but because it was classified and could not discuss even when they were considering the War Resolution.

LOL, this guy talks as if he was there and saw what Congress saw. The hell with you Col. This is just plain rediculous that you even claim such a thing as if you were a witness and are 100% sure of it.

Good bye for today and good luck in life.

23

drmiler

on Apr 26, 2006

Chrales.c

The members of Congress DID NOT have all the information Bush had. A FEW members may have had most of the information but because it was classified and could not discuss even when they were considering the War Resolution.

The information as to IF Saddam and Iraq was a REAL danger consisted of BOTH Intel about WMD as well as the military assessment of the capabilities of Iraq in late 2002. The most recent revelations from the former European CIA Chief like the same information from Mr. Piller prove that Bush ignored ANY Intelligence that did not support what he had decided to do - Invade Iraq. Both these CIA Agents were like long members of the CIA and BOTH were head of sections within the CIA where they saw ALL THE INTELLIGENCE.

Then you have the information from the retired generals like Zinni and Trainor. Even if you do not agree wit their call for Rumsfeld to resign, the information they have provided about the military assessment of the danger posed by Iraq as well as the WMD issue show that much of the available information was ignored by Bush because he had decided to remover Saddam and the intelligence about WMD nor the Military capability of Iraq to be a threat was not important to Bush. We went to war against a country that had NO MILITARY CAPABILITY, which was proven be the swift defeat of their military. We also went to war against a country that had no WMD as Bush and Cheney said absolutely they had in spades!

I'd watch your back col....looks like you have two of us riding your butt now.

24

COL Gene

on Apr 26, 2006

Yes - Two people that do not know what they are talking about!!!!!!!!!!!

25

drmiler

on Apr 26, 2006

Yes - Two people that do not know what they are talking about!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh Yeah....and 1 brainless idiot on the recieving end.