Constructive gadfly
Published on February 20, 2006 By stevendedalus In Politics

Labor and Capital no longer are at odds thanks to the influence of Reaganomics on the “right to work” movement in the 80s to shatter, unions, making it possible for even union members not to have to pay their dues, let alone those with a right not to join and yet reap the benefits of the organized. This conservative strategy to bust or limit unions began in the 60s by the non-industrial states, tempting capital to invest in large chunks of the nation where labor was cheap.

Now the strategy has been carried globally where underdeveloped nations pick up their skirts of inexpensive prostitution of labor what once was used in Arkansas and its ilk to flaunt cheap, much available workers. Capital now has dipped dramatically into China’s pool of virtual slave labor where there is more bang to the buck. There is no right or wrong here: it’s simply the means of capital to justify the ends. The greatest possible return is through productivity where costly research and skill required of modern machinery is secondary when radical, brute exploitation is the byword.

 

Copyright © 2006 Richard R. Kennedy All rights reserved. Revised: February 20, 2006.

http://stevendedalus.joeuser.com

 


Comments
on Feb 20, 2006
One of your more insightful blurbs, steve. Wish you had provided some links regarding the Reagan actions in the '80's..now I've got to look it up all by myself!
on Feb 24, 2006
The momentum for this reactionary movement was firing the air-traffic controllers.
on Feb 24, 2006
You have meddled with the primal forces of nature, Mr. Beale, and I won't have it. Is that clear? You think you merely stopped a business deal. That is not the case. The Arabs have taken millions of dollars out of this country, and now they must put it back. It is ebb and flow, tidal gravity. It is ecological balance. You are an old man, who thinks in terms of nations, and peoples. There are no nations, there are no peoples, there are no Russians, there are no Arabs, there are no Third Worlds; there is no West. There is only one holistic system of systems. One vast and interwoven, interacting, multi-variant, multi-national dominion of dollars. Petro-dollars, electro-dollars, multi-dollars, Reichmarks, Rubles, Pounds and Sheckles.

It is the international system of currency which determines the totality of life on this planet. That is the natural order of things today. That is the atomic, and sub-atomic, and galactic structure of things today. And you have meddled with the primal forces of nature. And you will atone.

You get up on your little 21 inch screen, and howl about “America”, and “democracy.” There is no America, there is no democracy. There is only IBM and ITT and AT&T. And Dupont, Dow, Union Carbide, and Exxon. Those are the nations of the world today.

We no longer live in a world of nations and ideologies, Mr. Beale. The world is a college of corporations, inexorably determined by the immutable by-laws of business. The world is a business, Mr. Beale.

--Arthur Jensen, CEO of UBS ("Network" written by Paddy Chayefsky, directed by Sidney Lumet, released 1976)
on Feb 24, 2006
I'm mad as hell, but I can probably take a bit more, if it pays well, and everyone has healthcare...
on Feb 26, 2006
Great excerpt, Kingbee. In God We Trust.[or Allah's Petro Rules]
on Feb 26, 2006
I'm mad as hell, but I can probably take a bit more, if it pays well, and everyone has healthcare...


i sure am glad this post came up on the list again. i woulda hated missin out on your response.
on Feb 26, 2006
Great excerpt,


it just seemed to fit your essay. glad ya liked it.
on Feb 27, 2006
i sure am glad this post came up on the list again.
Baker is epitomizing the indifference of those fortunate enough to have health care and screw the 45 million who don't.
on Feb 27, 2006
45 million in a nation of almost 300 million with an unemployment rate of around 5%. On top of that you have the millions in college who don't get counted as unemployed. I've seen that number listed as the "uninsured and underinsured" which makes me think it even includes the elderly covered by the government.

Steven, I'm not indifferent. I just don't favor the suffering of the entire system in a hopeless, careless effort. If you want to propose something that isn't broken from the outset, feel free, but this blog, among others of yours lately, are heavy on dissent and pretty damned light on suggestion.
on Feb 28, 2006
If you want to propose something that isn't broken from the outset, feel free, but this blog, among others of yours lately, are heavy on dissent and pretty damned light on suggestion.
Out of some 600 hundred blogs, I'm guilty of light suggestions very seldom.Besides, this blog's negativism clearly implies alternatives that you know damn well that I have offered many times concerning health care particularly.
on Feb 28, 2006
Granted, granted...