Constructive gadfly
Published on February 14, 2006 By stevendedalus In Politics

CAMBRIDGE, Md. - The eavesdropping tables were turned on President Bush on Friday. The president apparently believed he was speaking privately when he talked about listening in without a warrant on domestic communications with suspected al-Qaida terrorists overseas. But reporters were the ones doing the listening in this time.

However, the microphones stayed on for a few minutes. That allowed journalists back at the White House to eavesdrop on Bush's defense of the eavesdropping. His private statements were basically no different from what he's said in public.

"I want to share some thoughts with you before I answer your questions," Bush began. "First of all, I expect this conversation we're about to have to stay in the room. I know that's impossible in Washington."

If what he said behind closed doors is what he has already said in public, then what was the point of sending reporters out of the room? Bush logic, I suppose.


Comments
on Feb 14, 2006
What kind of President says the same thing in private that he says in public? We can't be having any of that. That would be so un-American.
on Feb 14, 2006
We each see parts of the elephant and see different objects.  You saw a wall, I see a tree trunk.  What kind of president says the same thing in private as he does in public?  An Honest one.
on Feb 14, 2006
Can anyone point out to me the point of this article? Or is it that Bush Bashers are starting to immitate the Resident troll and his incredible ability to nit-pick anything Bush says or does and makes it look bad?
on Feb 14, 2006
kinda reminds me of when the microphones were still turned on during the Kerry run for president, except he was caught calling all republicans liars and thieves. Would Kerry say this in public? nope. At least Bush says in private them same things he would say in public,

You are stretching here Steven, maybe a nice article on how dick Cheney tried to murder his friend would be more appropriate.
on Feb 14, 2006
His private statements were basically no different from what he's said in public.

What kind of president says the same thing in private as he does in public? An Honest one.

Bush might just believe what he's been preaching for the past few months. Then again, he also might just believe in everything he's initiated as responses to war since 9/11.
on Feb 14, 2006
Looks like I should have included the [sarcasm][/sarcasm] brackets.
on Feb 15, 2006
We each see parts of the elephant and see different objects. You saw a wall, I see a tree trunk. What kind of president says the same thing in private as he does in public? An Honest one.
Agreed but naive honesty nonetheless--why say nothing I say leaves this room when he has already aired it publicly? Chop logic no matter how you see it.
on Feb 15, 2006
Communication is more than just the raw words, steve - you really need to hear the inflection & tone, see the body language, take in the context to understand what was meant. That's why it's so hard to "read" people in these forums - too one-dimensional.
on Feb 15, 2006
Did the reporters get clearance from FISA (Funny (but) Insignificant Story Act) before going ahead with this "news" item? ;~D
on Feb 15, 2006
At least Bush says in private them same things he would say in public,
I read it as redundancy.

Communication is more than just the raw words, steve - you really need to hear the inflection & tone, see the body language, take in the context to understand what was meant. That's why it's so hard to "read" people in these forums - too one-dimensional.
Charmingly put but we are not privy to backdoor inflections and nuances, just the written word. And when one someone says "I want what I say to not leave this room," I don't take it as a joke--there's suspicion perhaps, despite appearing superfluous.