Constructive gadfly
Published on December 8, 2005 By stevendedalus In Politics

On the surface merit pay for teachers appears as a no brainer; still, how would it be determined?

             It is known that school administrators have favorite staff members because they don’t present burden the office with discipline problems, which does not automatically make them good facilitators of learning.

             Based on the number of ‘A’s in the class, but how does one determine “easy” ‘A’s as opposed to “hard” ‘A’s?

             Frequent classroom observations unduly absorbs time for other administrative tasks.

             Preference to teachers from prestigious universities in contrast to state teachers college.

             Parent and student input into assessment of a teacher.

             Unions partake the merit process.

             Measuring reward from year to year — what if a “superior” teacher happens to be assigned a “great” class one year and poor one the next resulting in frustrated teaching? Should the teacher lose his/her status?


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Dec 11, 2005
This isn't about "Performance". Teachers are shackled with a bureaucracy so tangled with idiocy that "performance" rarely enters into it. Teachers aren't responsible for the idiotic curriculum or the socialistic state of education. You'd simply cut into their wages, punishing them for the ineptitude of their socialist overseers. Not unlike a Stalinistic state making huge demands of people toiling in a sad, failed system.
on Dec 11, 2005

Tell that to the tens of thousands losing their jobs thanks to outsourcing.

Raises Hand!  That would be me, and yet I still found a way to suceed.

2 Pages1 2