Constructive gadfly
Published on January 28, 2009 By stevendedalus In Politics

Why does the "other" party play into FDR’s "fear in itself"? How can the party of states’ rights object to bailing out the states desperately cutting budgets to the detriment of their financial status? What better way to kick off the economy than to assist locales in Medicaid, school budgets and repairs, community colleges, and a host of other ways to reduce unemployment roles and deterioration of infrastructures? Apparently, the party perceives aid as just another road to perks rather than common good investments. If we truly want to stimulate the economy, we cannot ignore the needs closer to home.

Furthermore, in light of the huge deficits on the federal level, it strikes me as hypocritical to hold states to balanced budgets.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Feb 06, 2009

• $88 million for the Coast Guard to design a new polar icebreaker (arctic ship). Sounds reasonable and would put some people to work, though I question "design" and not actually building.

Wait a minute.  Isn't the arctic ice gone?  Can sail right across the northern edge of Canada now - 'proof' the AGW crowd's been throwing around, after all.  How did BO miss this opportunity to save money?

On a more general note, only the Republicans (and a few Democrats) are bothering to look at whether any of the provisions have intrinsic value (as opposed to a simple opportunity to throw money and create new constituencies).  'Stimulus' is a political, not economic, term; also known as pork on steroids.

on Feb 06, 2009

known as pork on steroids.

Nevertheless, one's pork is another's bacon for the family breakfast.

on Feb 06, 2009

Nevertheless, one's pork is another's bacon for the family breakfast.

Gonna be a very expensive breakfast when the kids in that family eventually get the bill.

2 Pages1 2