Constructive gadfly
according to George Will
Published on October 12, 2004 By stevendedalus In Politics

George will has targeted two democratic groups that have contributed to the impediment of the Republican ideology: trial lawyers and unions. Trial lawyers are the scapegoats for runaway health costs, though it affects less than one percent of the spiraling escalation. Unions, though on the decline in general, are substantially healthy in the governmental sector.

Will’s contention is that most of the work done by government — federal, state and local — could be performed by private contractors. This, of course, would include public education as well, which, he claims, generates a greater per-pupil cost than the private education that precludes union representation. Obviously Will does not bother to defend the higher costs of private universities as opposed to state institutions; nor does it stir him into checking out the number of defense contractors that are unionized — after all, national defense is sacrosanct. In addition, Will is not concerned with stats that may show that a well-fed army of government employees enhances a thriving economy by greater middle class consumption that is not hindered by individual costs of health insurance plaguing most of the private sector. And if there were massive cuts in the numbers of government employees, where would they go? — to the unproductive rolls of unemployment insurance. It is obvious that Will in opposition the Democratic Party is bent on diminishing the middle class by the presumed “on the cheap” private industries primarily obsessed with building a lower and higher class at the expense of those in the middle.

Trial lawyers, admittedly motivated by profiteering rather than championing the little guy in distress, nonetheless do, with the help of a jury, empower victims of blatant incompetence. Isolated incidents such as the old lady that burned her herself with MacDonald’s coffee is unquestionably absurd but could never make the cut of today’s frivolous test. Small business owners with insurance should only be sightly more wary of lawsuits than a private homeowner. The real problem is in the insurance companies themselves that are fraught with high deductibles and unreasonable cushioned premiums dedicated to the preservation of an excessively profitable bottom line. Return on the dollar from government taxes far exceed the bang for the buck that policy holders get from high liability insurance costs. Health insurance costs come from the exaggerated hysteria on the part of hospitals and physicians when they engage in unnecessary defensive medicine under the fearful pretense of litigation, admitting, as it were, to wholesale malpractice. The patent view, not the perception, is that overwhelmingly malpractice is undetected.

George Will also infers that conservatives are whetting their appetite for growing self-reliance as the aging population of the New Deal and WW II disappears from the face of the earth so that laissez-faire can be brush off and touched up with a new rugged face.

               

Copyright © 2004 Richard R. Kennedy All rights reserved. Revised: October 12, 2004.

http://stevendedalus.joeuser.com


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Oct 12, 2004
Great article!!
on Oct 12, 2004
Trial lawyers are the scapegoats for runaway health costs, though it affects less than one percent of the spiraling escalation


Please provide a source for this mis-statement. Other than triallawyers.org.

Trial lawyers, admittedly motivated by profiteering rather than championing the little guy in distress, nonetheless do, with the help of a jury, empower victims of blatant incompetence.


Oh, like blaming doctors for Cerebal Palsey? Blatant Incompetance? No, money grubbing, ambulance chasing shysters is more like it. NO one begrudges the ones who win blatant cases, but everyone knows that medicine is not exact, and man is not perfect. When it is not incompetance (apparently a lot if not most of the time), it is just amoral lawyers trying to shaft the system for their own gains, rarely their clients. That is just a byproduct of their amorality.
on Oct 12, 2004
The real problem is in the insurance companies themselves that are fraught with high deductibles and unreasonable cushioned premiums dedicated to the preservation of an excessively profitable bottom line

I haven't been hearing that insurance companies are making out like bandits. In fact, the insurance companies are the ones that pay out the damages on the lawsuits.
on Oct 12, 2004
I haven't been hearing that insurance companies are making out like bandits. In fact, the insurance companies are the ones that pay out the damages on the lawsuits.
they get it in back and then some by raising everyone's rates.
on Oct 12, 2004
but everyone knows that medicine is not exact, and man is not perfect.
There is avast difference in saving one's life, though imperfectly, from having one to many drinks before surgery. 
on Oct 12, 2004

Reply #4 By: stevendedalus - 10/12/2004 2:22:23 PM
I haven't been hearing that insurance companies are making out like bandits. In fact, the insurance companies are the ones that pay out the damages on the lawsuits.
they get in back and then some by rasing everyone's rates.


No way "and then some" Can you quote figures for this (what I believe to be) misinformation?
on Oct 12, 2004
Speaking of money, seems like a Nobel Laureate in Economics has said we need deeper tax cuts, not tax raises or 'rolling back' tax cuts.

Hmm.

Link to Article

- Grim X
on Oct 12, 2004
Will does not bother to defend the higher costs of private universities as opposed to state institutions.


Uh, Steve -

Last I checked, the reason "state" institutions have lower costs (assuming you mean tuition; not sure what else you'd mean) is that they are taxpayer-subsidized and made less expensive to attend as a matter of policy. Why would Will need to defend higher costs of private institutions? That would appear to have nothing to do with either unions or lawyers, and everything to do with the perceived value of the education they provide, otherwise their profs would be sitting in front of empty classrooms.

Cheers,
Daiwa
on Oct 13, 2004
Daiwa, true, it has nothing to do with lawyers  but Will did throw in public education as a cost gobbler in contrast to private ed. that is non-unionized. Private universities do inflate their tuition because of prestige and scholarships, yet rake in megabucks from donations. Cheers.
on Oct 13, 2004
they get it in back and then some by raising everyone's rates.


That is exactly the problem. Damages from lawsuits prompt increased premiums. (Although I am skeptical of the "and then some" part.)

Private education tends to be cheaper when you are talking about primary and secondary education.
on Oct 13, 2004

The fact is, when people like Senator Edwards make millions of dollars, that money ultimately comes from us all. 

John Edwards has made tens of millions of dollars from malpractice lawsuits.  He didn't build something. He didn't create something. He is simply a drag on the economy. And thousands of lawyers like him do the same kinds of things. And their work ultimately results in higher costs for everyone.

But it's more than just higher costs, it creates higher suffering. Doctors having to run unnecessary tests to protect themselves.  Thanks largely to the work of Edwards, C-sections have become quite common because doctors fear the kinds of lawsuits Edwards was famous for. A C-section is MUCH more expensive and much more intense than a traditional child birth.

Stevend, you can run around claiming that such lawsuits are only 1% of the cost increases but the American people have some common sense. They can see with their own eyes. And no massaging of statistics is going to change that.

on Oct 13, 2004
It's "hard work" criticizing lawyers.

on Oct 13, 2004
Yeah, but some of what trial lawyers do is good. If I go in to get my appendix taken out and they amputate my leg, I want to be able to sue.
on Oct 13, 2004
Steven:

Great article. George Will has been pushing for privitization of public services for many, many years. The interesting thing is that he sincerely believes that it would help us to have non-public education and in effect, no healthcare system except ones funded privately.

Boy would that change America. Of course, I don't hear the neocons calling for a reduction in CORPORATE law suits and CORPORATE lawyers. Just the ones who would help regular people.
on Oct 13, 2004
A reduction on COPORATE lawsuits sounds fine to me. Generally though when I hear about a lawsuit, a corporation is the target, not the one filing suit.

Will is not concerned with stats that may show that a well-fed army of government employees enhances a thriving economy by greater middle class consumption that is not hindered by individual costs of health insurance plaguing most of the private sector.


Or in other words: People who don't have to pay for their health care have an advantage over people who pay for their own health care.
2 Pages1 2