Constructive gadfly
Published on September 15, 2007 By stevendedalus In Politics
That a nation bred out of Diaspora would deny refugees entry to their land is ironic. Considering Israel’s paranoia of its predominately European make up becoming a minority particularly with the ominous pressure of Palestinian’s “right of return,” in addition to being a very small country, it is understandable despite the besmirched image. Nonetheless, Israel is allowing 500 from Darfur while deciding to expel 1200 to Egypt, but so far only 48 as Egypt is not keen on the idea, having already 2 million Sudanese, including refugees from Darfur. The point here is how long will the UN put up with this impasse in lieu of forcefully rectifying the displaced and genocidal conditions in Sudan? And why can’t the African nations unite and protest these atrocities?
Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Sep 19, 2007
As I answered you before on another blog: it was not justification to commit ground troops.



Since the ceasefire agreement was broken, a return to the same level of hostilities that existed before the ceasefire was signed is completely legitimate. If a return to hostilities is not a legitimate option for a broken ceasefire, then the ceasefire has no value at all.

Or do you consider killing cleaning ladies in aspirin factories a more legitimate option?
2 Pages1 2