Constructive gadfly
Published on September 7, 2007 By stevendedalus In Religion

Who gives a hoot what Christopher Hitchens thinks about Mother Teresa’s dark confessions? He’s only venting reference to them to justify his atheism in tandem with sadistic pleasure in lambasting the Catholic Church in having allowed Teresa to continue on with her overly “enthusiastic” good will works while it knew that she was but creating maddening busy work to offset and to spite her loss in faith.

From Peter’s thrice denial, Judas’ treachery and Jesus utterance of being forsaken by his father to those in working daily in homicide, coal miners trapped, Red Cross workers, and our troops in Iraq have all questioned negatively their god. Only artists of self-deception would not face up to doubt, like Pat Robertson, the late Jerry Falwell, the Pope, and Billy Graham, all of whom had little if any on the scene duration of poverty and conflict, are blessedly pure in their unshakable faith.

Missionaries of integrity are a unique breed and miles apart from the normal us who are too busily engaged in the secular whirlwind along the highway to abundance. These dedicated persons take a vow of poverty and commensurate sufferings as it would be grossly unseemly to do otherwise in the midst of others’ trying desperately to stay alive with minimal comfort or to die in peace, though seldom achieved. This is normal for “saintly” do-gooders who feel they must do more to diminish the lack of regard by God. This is somewhat akin to keeping busy after having lost a loved one. What human coming from a world of plenty while immersed in the brutality of want of healthcare, food and housing, not to mention numerous natural disasters, and most of all humanity’s indifference to millions in dire need would not say to God, “Where art Thou?”

That Hitchens the atheist is against Teresa’ canonization is a laughable tautology. Granted, in looking over the sea of clean, healthy faces of the Nobel audience in sharp contrast to a lifetime of daily living in destitution, she uttered the conceit that abortion threatened world peace. However, ludicrous to many, it was her icon for commitment to life apart from Conrad’s Heart of Darkness: “The horror, the horror.”

And surely her speech was a courageous affirmation of her own unique faith.
Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Sep 11, 2007
That isn't at all what Buddhism teaches. Where'd you get that?


This is very similiar to what I have put forth to So Daiho in some of our discussions. Could it be that there are different kinds of Buddhist beliefs?

Isn't Buddha's way attaining the goal of nothingness?
on Sep 11, 2007
Isn't Buddha's way attaining the goal of nothingness?
Not really. Nirvana is mistaken as that but it is really consciousness of complete,but disinterested wisdom and passion. 
on Sep 11, 2007
I always thought the 2 were from separate places on the male.
How can you separate the bubbling consciousness of lust from the actual drive?
on Sep 12, 2007
This is very similiar to what I have put forth to So Daiho in some of our discussions. Could it be that there are different kinds of Buddhist beliefs?


Could it be? It's practically encouraged. Buddha basically said "Here's how I did it, but it doesn't matter how I did it. What matters is that YOU do it, and how you do it is something you have to work out."

That's an argument I, myself, have with "sects" (Zen, Mahayana, Theravedan, etc...) They fall into the labelling trap and begin to proselytize on the way Buddha said it's supposed to be without remembering what I wrote above. Buddha said "To be attached to one thing (to a certain view) and to look down upon other things (views) as inferior - this the wise men call a fetter."

Isn't Buddha's way attaining the goal of nothingness?


That's kind of a rough translation that is very often, and improperly, interpreted as pessimistic.

One of he basic premises of Buddhism is that the spirit is continually reborn until it achieves Enlightenment. It is reborn because it is attached to this phisical form in some way(s) or another. Following that is the four Noble truths (so they are called).

1. That Life is suffering (another word where people often stop at the first common definition and go no further. In Buddhism, suffering can be anything from having your arm ripped off to just missing a friend or being slightly hungry. Any lack you perceive in your life is suffering. This is where it gets pretty scientific (in my opinion) It deals with the nature of attachment and how consciousness arises when a sensory organ (your eyes, nose, skin, etc...) encounter an object that can be perceived by that sensory input followed by an attachment of meaning to that experience.

2. The Origen of this suffering. The arising of "suffering" is caused by thirst for those attachment experiences. And you should note it not only includes those who thirst for everlasting life, but those who thirst for everlasting death as well...which flies in the face of the goal of Buddhism to achieve perfect nothingness - as you understand nothingness.

3. The Noble truth of Cessation means that there is a way to stop the endless cycle of rebecoming into a world where all there is, in one form or another, is suffering of some variety.

4. The Way. This last noble truth is the way out. It leads into what Buddhists call the eight-fold path, which I won't get into for brevity's sake.

Perhaps I'll write a bit more later, but my attachment to paying my bills says it's time to go to work
on Sep 15, 2007
I'm finding it quite interesting to read about the history of Ur of the Chaldees. As you'll recall from Gen 11:31. Know anything about the place? Quite enlightening.


It is very fascinating. Ur of Chaldees is also known as Mesopotomia also known as part of Iraq. Its about 200 miles from Baghdad. It's where Abraham was called OUT of. One of the gods worshipped there was the Moon God. I'm thinking the god of the sun and fire was also worshipped there. Seems kind of interesting that the Muslims have a crescent on their shrines.

Ur also dervived from fire which is another interesting tidbit.

You can see more of this in Acts 7:2-3 in Stephen's speech.

on Sep 19, 2007
One of the gods worshipped there was the Moon God. I'm thinking the god of the sun and fire was also worshipped there. Seems kind of interesting that the Muslims have a crescent on their shrines
Not surprising that the primitives needed their icons just as we do today, except theirs were more natural.
2 Pages1 2