Constructive gadfly
Published on March 17, 2006 By stevendedalus In Politics
 

Flamethrower's Remarks

really very simple, George is the epitome of everything the far left hates.


George is Pro-American the far left is NOT!


George is for traditional values, the Far left hates traditional values and is looking to turn America into Europe.


George keeps his word, the left has no word to keep.


George believes marriage is between a man and women, the left believes it's between a man and child, two women or two men, soon to come, man and his horse.


George is faithful to his friends, the left has no friends, only sycophants.


Maybe some more comparisons from the members of the right can be added?

Rational Remarks


Keep it simple, not emotional: George is the epitome of everything the far left justly opposes, such as incompetent governance, unwanted war and its undercurrents of saber rattling concerning Iran.


George may be pro-American, but also its ugly side — tax cuts for his upper wealthy cronies, cutting benefits for vets, avoiding the health issue with a subterfuge exorbitant prescription plan for seniors while the 42 million do without any kind of health care except for emergency visits to hospitals, wrapping himself in the flag of patriotic deceit.


So-called traditional values are actually new values huckstered into the political arena by Christian fundamentalists who are not content with letting alone their own private religious values to their conscience.


In keeping his word George certainly took us to war, and by his god we will stay the course through a country on the brink of civil war and chaos.


Most leftist also believe marriage as between a man and a woman, but does not try to ram it down the throats of gays — as for the rest cited, I’ll not honor its gauche expressions.


As for friends, ask Harriet and the UAE; it’s true I personally have few friends out of design, lest an uncontrollable batch become sycophants as some of the followers of Modman.


Perhaps this will lead to members of the left to stand up to this incorrigible Flamer.

 

Copyright © 2006 Richard R. Kennedy All rights reserved. Revised: March 17, 2006.

http://stevendedalus.joeuser.com

 


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Mar 22, 2006
#15 by Chaos Manager
Wednesday, March 22, 2006


Nice example of tolerance and acceptance of humanity, that.


when will you understand the left is only accepting and tolerant when you totally submit to their sick and twisted ideals?
on Mar 22, 2006
If certain minority groups want to be free from having another group's value system forced upon them, then the minority groups should refrain from trying to force their value system on the other group.
Axiomatic.

submit to their sick and twisted ideals?
Not idealistic, but realistic that values are dynamic, not fixed and privy only to religion.
on Mar 22, 2006
Marriage has ONLY existed between a man and a woman since God created the institution.


when exactly did that occur again?
on Mar 22, 2006
If Christians want mixed marriages, let them have mixed marriages.

If homosexuals want same-sex marriages, let them have same-sex marriages.

I don't see why the state should condone or support either. And I don't see why condoning the one constitutes respect for a belief while condoning the other or both constitutes homosexuals forcing their behaviour on the rest of us.


100% agreement, Leauki. I personally think homosexuality is wrong, but believe the government should be morally neutral on this. The government should get out of the marriage business altogether, in my arrogant opinion.
on Mar 22, 2006
The government should get out of the marriage business altogether, in my arrogant opinion.
Amen.
on Mar 22, 2006

The government should get out of the marriage business altogether, in my arrogant opinion.
Amen.

See?  We can agree on somethings.

on Mar 22, 2006
I have said for a long time that the homosexual lobby has made a major strategic mistake on this one. Their argument is predicated on their belief that homosexuality is not a choice, but rather, the way they are born. There are some individuals, and I count myself among them, who will probably never believe this, no matter how many "experts" you throw in my face. A simpler solution, in my opinion, is to simply concede, for the sake of argument that homosexuality is a choice, even if that's not what you believe, but remind people that our TRADITION revolves around allowing adults to make choices for themselves, provided that those choices include consenting adults and don't infringe on the rights of others. You will still find opponents to this argument, but I'm willing to bet there won't be as many.
on Mar 23, 2006
Their argument is predicated on their belief that homosexuality is not a choice, but rather, the way they are born.
I grant you that it is a mistake for them to exclude the possibility of choice. Some are, I believe, born thay way, others by choice, and I fear there are too many that are caught up in the lifestyle and are really oppressed into orientation.
2 Pages1 2